dvader
TF Ace
I will keep it short,Your post raises strong concerns about IndusInd Bank, but I’d like to dig deeper into your perspective. Let’s unpack this:
1. CEO Removal as a “Message”: You suggest firing the CEO regardless of merit to signal change. But if the C-suite is truly incompetent, wouldn’t the board need specific justification (beyond symbolism) to avoid worsening governance issues? How does removing a CEO—without evaluating their actual performance—align with improving governance? Could this risk further instability?
2. Regulatory Role: You highlight transparency gaps in “non-regulated segments” and governance failures. Why do you think the RBI hasn’t intervened if these issues are systemic? Are there specific lapses you’re referencing (e.g., disclosures, capital adequacy), or is this more about the bank’s internal culture?
3. Unregulated Segments: What exactly are these segments? IndusInd operates largely as a regulated entity under RBI oversight. Are you suggesting they’re operating in unregulated areas?
4. C-Suite Competency: How did you assess the executives’ incompetence? Is this about strategic missteps, ethical concerns, or something else?
Your critique has valid undertones, but hyperbole like “stuck in the 2000s” or symbolic CEO firings risks oversimplifying complex issues. IndusInd’s challenges likely demand structural reforms—not just leadership theatrics. What’s your vision for practical steps the board could take beyond a CEO shakeup?
Looking forward to your thoughts!
PS: If you have insider insights or documents pointing to these issues, sharing them (anonymously?) could spark a more actionable discussion.
PPS: I’m still pondering what you mean by “don't want them to become IDFC/HDFC either.”
1. All this happened on the CEO's watch. If he knew what was going on, he would be a bad guy and should be out; if he didn't, he would be incompetent and should be out anyway. RBI also wants this CEO out and has been trying to get rid of him since his first extension. IndusInd's Boards is keeping him because RBI has been trying to get an external CEO and they are, for some reason, uncomfortable with it.
2. IndusInd is not just a bank. They are part of IndusInd International Holding Ltd, they recently completed the acquisition of Reliance Capital. IndusInd works in international investment, they invest money (this is independent of any client or retail deposit). This is the unregulated segment I am talking about. As soon as RBI bought new regulations, IndusInd complied and would move such investments to other subsidiaries. These issues are not systemic, but RBI being an excellent regulator is avoiding even the slightest of irregularities with commercial banks. Note: All banks make such investments, IndusInd happens to make an accounting error and ruined it for everyone else.
3. Explained in point 2
4. The CFO resigned last year, and RBI is trying to get rid of its CEO. While all this is happening, we get the internal audit report. That's gross and borderline criminal incompetence. I don't assess Competency, as long as the C-Suit manages to stay out of these controversies that's good enough.
IDFC: They went with tech first approach. Their process are so strict even the branch personnel have very little to no leeway in banking processes. Now for some this is good but it's not my taste.
HDFC: They have become too big, basically a sarkari bank.
IndusInd, RBL, YesBank etc are your middle-of-the-road banks. IndusInd in particular has been really good if you can go around it's quirks.